Crimes and Misdemeanors, the 1989 film directed by Woody Allen, is a
heartbreaking, chilling and cynical look at a group of intersecting individuals
within New York City. The film follows Judah Rosenthal an ophthalmologist who
is torn after murdering his mistress Dolores Paley, and Cliff Stern, a documentary film maker trapped in a loveless marriage. Stern pines
after Halley Reed, a producer, while sabotaging a documentary based on the
successful T.V producer Lester who also happens to be his brother-in-law. The film
manages to pervert and contradict the messages within the novel Crime and
Punishment by Fyodor Dostoevsky. These messages include the central
existentialist point of bad faith and contextualizing it in a rapidly
progressing capitalist and materialistic America lead by Ronald Reagan. This
essay will look at bad faith exhibited through the characters of Judah
Rosenthal, Dolores Paley, and Cliff Stern. The bad faith riddled throughout
this film heavily pertains towards bad judgement and non-traditional moral
ethics. Additionally, we will explore how bad faith is presented through Judah's
persistent sense of guilt and his conversations with a Rabbi who is a patient that is going blind and fictional bantering with his deceased family . Cliff's bad faith musings comes through his younger niece, and the
Professor Louis Levy a brilliant philosopher who is the subject of his
documentary. Crimes and Misdemeanors subjects the audience to Woody
Allen's view of bad faith, that God is a moral burden we put on ourselves. While
Crime and Punishment echoes the
central theme that moral salvation and redemption could be found
within God, Crimes and Misdemeanors approaches the theme from the opposite direction. Moral
integrity and faith no longer can come from the message of God but rather
material wealth, social status, and brevity. The individuals who pursue their
own selfish actions and dismiss a religious rhetoric or a traditional moral
philosophical view of life prosper. But those who cling on fate and religious
beliefs are blinded or left wearing glasses, unaware and unable to see this
rapidly changing world.
Cliff Stern's bad faith is two separate
actions that ultimately fold together in the final scene. While he acts in bad
faith by actively pursuing a woman while not ending or discussing his crumbling
marriage. He additionally acts out in bad faith by sabotaging and parodying
Lester’s documentary by lampooning him, making Lester out to be arrogant,
lecherous, and smug. While he could use the funds of this to finish his passion
project on Professor Levy he rather continuously acts in Bad Faith ultimately
baiting Lester to fire him. In the end not only has bad faith led him to a divorce,
his nemesis getting the girl, and never getting to finish his documentary he is
seemingly unaware of any lessons to be found of it. He appropriates blame on
the individuals around him rather questioning and expanding his own character.
“What is the guy so upset about? You think the guy was never compared to
Mussolini before.” (1:25:00). By sabotaging the documentary and putting a
subjective tint on Lester he has taken on the role of the "Eyes of
God" mentioned in the film, in his
arrogant belief he has assumed himself to be infallible. He tries to make
Lester in his own subjective image of what he perceives him to be. He acts in
bad faith while doing this, he like every other character that is morally
blinded behind spectacles he is also blinded by the camera lens. Cliff is the
character most imbued with the idea of understanding man and their actions but
he ultimately is the most clueless one. He is unaware of the transgressions of
Halley and Lester, not believing it till finally sees it with his own eyes. The
eyes of God which he arrogantly co-opted to mean himself finally reveal the
truth behind this maddening and nihilistic scenario. Earlier in the film his
sister recants a tale of a man defecating on her tied up against her own will.
This is also an example of bad faith put upon her as it goes against her own
moral comfort. Although not only is Woody Allen is as a humorous but morbid
story but that life sometimes take defecates on you. In a larger scale Woody
Allen is insinuating that assuming a role of helpless in fate and destiny is
allowing ourselves to be guided and controlled by exterior forces; we are
allowing ourselves to be shat upon. This to Woody Allen is the ultimate form of
bad faith. Examples in Crimes and Misdemeanors
include the rabbi going blind, to Cliff abiding to the philosophy extolled by
the Professor, and believing that Halley will make the right choice. The
individual must be the one who takes action and assume control to gain
superiority. This ultimately is the path Halley, Lester, and Judah have
followed and they ultimately prevail. Cliff’s romanticism is brought to a full
understanding in the end when he tries to suggest a better ending for Judith’s
confession which was pitched as a story. He asserts more of a cinematic ending with
graver and melodramatic proportions. However, Judah warns him, “But that’s
fiction that’s movies, I mean you have seen too many movies. I am talking about
reality I mean if you want a happy ending you should go see a Hollywood movie.”
(1:38:51). This is a clear jab at Cliff’s repeated instances of watching films,
at times to get closer to Halley. Additionally, after specific dramatic scenes
ends, the next scenes are from films that Cliff is watching, that tie together
thematically and with the narrative. After the murder of Dolores a woman is
singing in a film, the words “murder” is repeated many times. Woody Allen is
asserting that thinking a Hollywood ending or moments is tangible or waiting in
the brushes is acting in completely in bad faith. Cliff thinking his romantic
pursuits in the style of Hollywood (love letters, romantic dates) would woo
Halley, however this is an egregious error, and she chooses Lester and her career.
A Crumbling marriage, dead-end career, and a woman who spurs him, ignoring all
of this is acting in bad faith. Hence why he says “This is my worst fear
realized” (1:32:40). The fear is not only the rejection by Halley but the
philosophical and thematic lessons he learnt from Hollywood. So in the end when
Judah the individual we think is the most morally corrupt gives the most
ironically poignant advice, which comes in the form of a perverted Hollywood
lesson.
Judah’s introduction in
Crimes and Misdemeanors is an
integral thematic and character point that is expanded upon further in the
film. By showing him first talking on a podium, we have foreshadowed the role
he has assumed in life. His development throughout the film makes him realize
that he can play God standing above others, for he can be his own God and so he
murders to maintain personal success and prosperity. A character before him on
the same podium recants to the audience the many humanitarian efforts and
achievements Judah has reached in his life. The film makes this a justifying
reason later in the film for his murder of Dolores Paley. Later we see Judah
standing at the podium quoting his father “The eyes of God are on us always”
(0:05:03). This not only is an introduction to his theological and moral
dilemma but rather a statement on the bad faith he engages in by murdering
Dolores. This adulterous relationship is the first instance of bad
faith for him, not only is he jeopardizing his family and current lifestyle but
his professional career. As Dolores states she is aware of an embezzling scheme
that Judah is a part of, so after much internal deliberation he decides to murder
her. Although this murder ties in with his personal philosophical mantra as Ben
the rabbi stipulates, “This is a fundamental difference in how we view the
world you see it as harsh and empty of values...” (0:17:21). Even though Judah
is skeptical, a man of reason who views the world as harsh the murder starts devour
him. He becomes tense and hostile towards his family an outburst at dinner, he contemplates
giving himself up, visiting the crime scene; a man dedicated to giving sight to
others is starting to lose his. Judah much like his counterpart Raskolnikov
finds their nihilist and valueless society being upended, both realizing ethics
and morality is not firmly situated in religious reason but in all man as well.
Ultimately Judah’s guilt becomes too much and so he decides visits his
childhood home for some moral understanding and guidance. He reminisces about a
family dinner where his aunt May extols atheistic creed. While Professor Levy
finds an optimistic message and the positive spirit of man after world war two, Aunt Mays philosophy takes the opposite direction. In her words “For those want
morality there’s morality, nothings handed down in stone”, (1:11:06). Judah’s
father counteracts with, “If necessary I will always pick God over truth.”
(1:13:28). Judah is armed with two options from two radically different points
of view. His decision at the end is not reached in an onscreen climatic
realization of himself like Raskilnikov but a moment of clarity that captures
him off screen. “And then one morning he awakens and the sun are shining and
his family is around him and mysteriously the crisis is lifted. Take his family
to a vacation to Europe and as the months pass he finds he is not punished and
he in facts prosper.” (1:36:57). this specific quote asserts the notion that
there is an absence of a deity in Woody Allen’s eye, those in who fact confront
their own moral dilemma without a religious eye face it with the most truth. Additionally
that a Hollywood climatic realization isn’t the most truthful element of
humanity but rather a determent, the only thing closest to a creator within the
universe of Crimes and Misdemeanors
is Woody Allen and he has let his judgment cast out.
Dolores
Paley's bad faith becomes a cautionary tale within the film. Her death
encompasses the crime labeled in the title. Against her better judgment and
acting in bad faith she allowed her free will to be squashed and denied as she
pursued the passionate relationship with Judah. Unlike the successful
characters within the film she allowed herself not to be self-actualized and
denied living a full life, “I gave up things for you, business opportunities!
And there were other men who wanted me” (0:05:17). She found meaning, purpose,
and understanding through a secondary source like other hapless individuals in
the film. Unlike the religious who relied on God, Professor Levy whose
foundation lay on the individuals around him, her life encompassed Judah. By
letting him consume her life in its entirety, (both literally and
metaphorically) she acts completely in bad faith. Woody Allen stresses to the
audience the individual should not rely on others, or a religious moral compass
but rather your own entity. The only supportive and understanding character is
Cliff's niece who’s still too young to be malleable and turned by the
temptations of God, consumerism, love, and selfish pursuit which become the
downfall of some of the individuals within this film.
The Bad Faith
found within Crimes and Misdemeanors uses the visual motif of eyeglasses
to represent the blind and the seers. The individuals preaching and following
the custom of an omnipotent deity in God are always wearing spectacles from the
Rabbi who is slowly going blind, Judah’s father, and his Rabbi when he was younger.
The extension of bifocals is not only burden by a religious capacity but rather
expanded to the moral philosophy found in Cliff's subplot, as Professor Levy
don's them. These individuals are shrouded behind a view they assume sharpens
and clears their moral outlook on life and assume superiority as long as they
do the right thing curtailing to God. In contrast the individuals who eschew a
Godless identity, put claim in individual achievements, success,
materialism, and monetary gain are sans spectacles. Individuals like Judah's
brother Jack, Lester, the Aunt and the Uncle at the table who see the Godless
nihilist society that we encompass. These individuals act in the proper faith
both finding meaning and success in particular Lester and Jack without the
support of God. This bad faith is transplanted, while the religious literally
go blind (Ben the Rabbi), under the guise of what they believe is right, the
glass-less see the world for what is, a harsh truth that is inescapable and are
better to cope with it. The people divided in the film co-opt this visual
metaphor as they duel their own conscious as they grapple with what is morally
right. For example depending on the scene Judah wears glasses or not. The moral
times where he is unable to cope with Dolores death or pondering he wears
glasses, and when he divulges to the Rabbi. He allows a moral lense to filter
his actions, as the dichotomy of "good and evil" war after each
other. At the wedding in the final scenes he has finally shed off this
perception of moral right and accepted a glassless fate like Lester, Jack, his
aunt and uncle. This duality isn't the only representation of bad fate within Judah
but rather found in Halley Reed as well. She continuously wears glasses
throughout the film, large ones that obstruct her features. Halley assumes that
she has assimilated a proper outlook, a morally good one that mollifies her
demands in life. However, marrying Lester to further her own career goals we
finally see her without spectacles. Halley has tossed these glasses aside and
joined the ranks of the individuals like Lester and Judah who find morals,
identity, and purpose outside of a Godless society; her career. Clifford clings
on to the teachings of Professor Levy in the end, his face covered with these
lenses unaware that they are ironically blinding him and not allowing him to
see the world for what it is. As the beginning of the film tells us the eyes of
God are watching, by saying these eyes are literally of God, some characters
have acted in bad faith. Unbeknownst to them the pious have been led astray and
misappropriated the message. Woody Allen is not recruiting the idea of the
Abrahamic deity that we know of but rather our own moral compass, we are own
God and our own center of moral righteousness and meaning. For the individuals
who have not grasped these concept they remain hazy or go blind, continuously
acting in bad faith.
The existentialist and philosophical themes
within Crimes and Misdemeanors are
literally stated in the final scene, a voice over by Professor Levy
encapsulating the events that occurred. The films message of finding or own
moral purpose is solidified, “But we define ourselves by the choices we have
made, we are in fact the sum total of our choices.”(1:40:03). However by taking
this message literally and hoping it has taught us a Hollywood lesson is too
simplistic. For by taking this message we have not enabled free will and made
our own choice but one dictated to us by the film, thus making a contradictory
statement against the themes the film presented. Woody Allen presented himself
as Cliff the documentary film maker is not only questioning the bad faith and
religious crisis of Judah, but of himself. Woody Allen is coming to copes with
being a Jewish child in the aftermath of the holocaust, unfurling the events as
a documentary film maker. Woody Allen in reality is so offended by the actions
of the Nazis he unlike Professor Levy who professes a positive life message and
survived the holocaust cannot cope with an idea of God and is horrible shaken
by the war. So he decides not to act in bad faith by actively believing in a
religion he denies. So Levy’s death not only is the demise of a character
within a film but an entire view point of Woody Allen’s. He can no longer cope
with the philosophical good or moral right in life thus Crimes and Misdemeanors has become an admission of this belief. By
contextualizing it as reality and changing his profession from a fiction film
maker to a documentary film maker he is adding an objective lens. It is a way
to perceive the changing societal elements that are unfurling in his
generation, not only the holocaust but the impending collapse of the U.S.S.R.
With these collapses cause the further schism towards a more secular and
skeptical individual. One not acting on bad faith by learning of the previous generation’s
tragedies and misdeeds. Cliff like the people before him made the unfortunate
decision to document things outside of his own life (Lester), thus he becomes
blind. In the end this film explores the theme bad faith through the
protagonist Judah and supporting characters (Lester, Halley, Cliff) and that
trying to find a moral justification and fate outside our selves we are dooming
ourselves to be blind. We must be aware of our faults and desires and act upon
them, to serve our best interest and in the end tear away the shackles of bad
faith and not find moral absolution outside of ourselves.
No comments:
Post a Comment